F-GA4Q FUEL DISPENSER

F-GA4Q FUEL DISPENSER

FlowMeter Type : Optional

Accuracy :±0.2%

Pressure Loss (kg/cm) :Under 0.25

Motor Voltage(V) :110V/220V/380V,50Hz/60Hz

Capacity(hp) :1HP(0.75kw)

Input Voltage :110V/220V/380V,50Hz/60Hz

Nozzle : Auto Shut-off Nozzle

Environmental Condition : -40~~+55degree

Control Type : Solenold Vale Control Type

Preset : Function Provided(Small LCDIndicator)

Display(Counter) :Type LCD and Bright Backlight

Digit of Volume: 0~~999,999(6 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Amount :0~~999,999(6 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Unit price : 0~~9999(4 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Total Range :0~~99,999,999,99

Optional Display: Type LCD and Bright Backlight

Digit of Volume : 0~~99,999,999(8 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Amount :0~~99,999,999(8 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Unit price : 0~~999999(6 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Total Range : 0~~99,999,999,99

Totalizer :1~~9,999,999

Hose :4.5m

Weight : 350kg

Dimension(L×W×H): 1660*660*2190(mm)

Dimension(L×W×H)Of Qty of Container : 40ft: 17

on quickly increase in recent year, consumption of finished oil increase al well, the vapor pollution and resource waste in forecourt become more important safety factor in considerable filing station, safety distance and vapor density in particular. At present, vapor separator device is installed and obtain content effect in most of large and middle cities reference to foreign improving measures. Its recovery principle is divide fuel dispenser d as two phases: first phase refers to closed discharge from tank vehicle; second phase refers to vapor recovery as refueling oil. Phase I vapor-recovery system The first phase system aims at to rebuild the delivery pipe and vapor recovery pipe between vehicle tank and tank. (Diagram 4-1) The volume of vapor will be increased as flowing into tank because of waves and shock. Therefore, the inlet pipe should be deeply stretched under oil level so as to reduce oil waves. As for a tank exceeding 945L of volume, inlet pipe is needed stretching into oil no higher 15cm than bottom of tank. Oil flows into tank from under level, vapor flow back into vehicle tank under pressure. In principle, the volume of oil and vapor is corrective. In order to make as little as vapor volatize during delivery, the structure of traditional ventilating pipe should be improved, making system in sealed state under normal pressure range. Reclaimed vapor is dealt with through condensation, adsorption and burn after taking back. Its operation principle is similar to the vapor system of balanced nozzle. Diagram 4-1: Phase I Vapor Recovery System The pipeline installation is illustrating in Diagram 4-2. The height of air pipe at least 4m. The length of back air is shorter than air pipe, diameter larger than that of air pipe. It is prohibited to appear overflow phenomenon as vehicle tank discharge, shut fuel dispenser off switch of air pipe. The jointer between air back and discharge pipe should adopt speed jointer. Phase II vapor-recovery system Phase II refers to the progress in which vapor in vehicle tank is fuel dispenser

eed not be　　unique for a customer and does not need to be injected at the factory or at the site.　　This method provides security against attacks such as physical penetration; device　　substitution; tapping; bypassing encryption; and transaction replay or alteration. The　　architecture employs a local key management zone. The zone always uses Derived Unique　　Key Per Transaction (DUKPT) and unique key per terminal. This pro fuel dispenser vides several　　advantages. First of all it allows the COPT to always use DUKPT and to employ a unique　　derivation key per COPT regardless of the key management method employed in the rest of　　the system. Because the COPT gets its initial key from the controller after installation the　　COPT does not have to be dedicated to specific customers reducing spares cost and　　decreasing MTTR. The method used to provide the initial key to the COPT is Exponential　　Key Exchange (Diffie-Hellman) a public key technique.　　During operation the data is collected at the COPT and encrypted under the DES Encryption　　Algorithm creating an encrypted data block. Using DUKPT the encrypted data is sent to the　　controller which can then be decrypted. The keys used by the COPT may be changed at any　　time if compromise is suspected (or just for additional security) without returning them to a　　key injection facility or taking a key loading device to the site.　　At the heart of the security structure is the use of Exponential Key Exchange to initialize the　　COPT from the controller. This technique makes possible many of the benefits mentioned　　earlier while providing a high level of security for data within the system.　　In the controller the data is decrypted. With the decrypted data in clear text in the controller　　the controller is always a possible target of attack.　　The metho fuel dispenser d used to provide the initial key in the COPT is to calculate the key at both the　　COPT and the controller. This method involves the transmission of interm fuel dispenser

ion against Saddam Hussein. By 2003, however, he had changed his mind. He opposed the invasion and has since argued publicly with prominent neoconservatives. In “America at the Crossroads�he claims that the invasion contradicted a basic neoconservative principle that large social-engineering projects (ie, state-building) often lead to unexpected consequences and undermine their own ends. And he believes the case for the i fuel dispenser nvasion was based on a false premise no, not the idea that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction but rather the notion that the threat from al-Qaeda was linked to Middle East tyranny and WMDs. The second of those views is more interesting than the first. The idea that it is hard to rebuild state institutions and what is now obscurely known as civil society is both true and unhelpful unless you conclude from it that America should avoid foreign entanglements altogether, as the neoconservatives emphatically do not, it is of little operational use. In Iraq, the Bush administration clearly underestimated what was required and proved incompetent in implementing even its own limited plans. But that observation could just as well lead you to conclude that it is wrong to attempt such things on the cheap as that it is wrong to do them at all. Mr Fukuyama s bolder claim is that the attempt in Iraq was unnecessary because it was irrelevant to the actual threat America faced. His argument is that the true threat posed by Islamic militants is not large-scale confrontation rooted in the troubles of the Middle East. It is smaller and more fragmented, and arises from Muslim alienation within European and American societies. In other words, it is a problem of the lack of integration of Muslims within those societies, not something that can be solved by a transformation of Arab or other fuel dispenser Muslim countries into democracies. The idea that the ultimate threat thus posed is of nuclear or other WMD terrorism, with weapons supplied perhaps by a hostile Muslim country, was absurdly overblo fuel dispenser